AIware 2026
Mon 6 - Tue 7 July 2026 Montreal, Canada
co-located with FSE 2026

This program is tentative and subject to change.

The ongoing transition of Large Language Models in software engineering from one-shot code generators into agentic partners requires a shift in how we define and measure success. While models are becoming more capable, the industry lacks a clear understanding of the behavioral norms that make an interactive SWE agent effective in collaborative software development in the enterprise. This work addresses this gap by presenting a taxonomy of desirable SWE agent behaviors, synthesized from 91 sets of developer-defined rules for SWE agents and validated through interviewing 15 experienced professional developers. In this taxonomy, we identify four core expectations: Adhere to Standards and Processes, Ensure Code Quality and Reliability, Solve Problems Effectively, and Collaborate with the Developer. These findings offer a concrete vocabulary for aligning SWE agent behavior with developer preferences, enabling researchers and practitioners to move beyond correctness-only benchmarks and start designing evaluations that reflect the socio-technical nature of professional software development in enterprises.

This program is tentative and subject to change.

Tue 7 Jul

Displayed time zone: Eastern Time (US & Canada) change

14:00 - 15:30
Human Factors, Responsible AIware, and Benchmarks & DatasetsBenchmark & Dataset Track / Main Track at MB 1.210
14:00
5m
Talk
Is Artificial Intelligence an Elixir to the Software Engineering Community? An Empirical Study Among Managers
Main Track
Xin Zhao Seattle University, Brian Vu Seattle University, US, Sitesh Pattanaik Donald Bren School of Information and Computer Sciences, University of California, Irvine, US
14:05
5m
Talk
Towards AI as a Collaborative Partner: A Taxonomy of AI Agent Behavior in Software Engineering
Main Track
Tao Dong Google, Sherry Shi Google, Harini Sampath , Andrew Macvean Google, Inc.
Pre-print
14:10
5m
Talk
Auditing Who Appears to Belong: A Large-Scale Empirical Study of Bias in Deployed Text-to-Image Systems for Software Engineering
Main Track
Mohamad Kassab Boston University
14:15
5m
Talk
Operationalizing Ethics for AI Agents: How Developers Encode Values into Repository Context Files
Main Track
Christoph Treude Singapore Management University, Sebastian Baltes Heidelberg University, Marc Cheong the University of Melbourne
Pre-print
14:20
5m
Talk
Accountable Agents in Software Engineering: An Analysis of Terms of Service and a Research Roadmap
Main Track
Christoph Treude Singapore Management University
Pre-print
14:25
5m
Talk
SOSecure: The Wisdom of the Crowd for Safer AI-Generated Code
Main Track
Manisha Mukherjee Carnegie Mellon University, Vincent J. Hellendoorn Google DeepMind
14:30
5m
Talk
SecVulEval: Context-Aware Benchmarking of LLMs for Vulnerability Detection
Benchmark & Dataset Track
Md Basim Uddin Ahmed York University, CA, Nima Shiri Harzevili York University, Jiho Shin York University, Hung Viet Pham York University, Song Wang York University
14:35
5m
Talk
SecMutBench: Evaluating LLM-Generated Security Tests via Mutation-Based Vulnerability Detection
Benchmark & Dataset Track
Mariam ALMutairi Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, US
14:40
5m
Talk
CrossCommitVuln-Bench: A Dataset of Multi-Commit Python Vulnerabilities Invisible to Per-Commit Static Analysis
Benchmark & Dataset Track
Arunabh Majumdar Independent Researcher, IN
14:45
5m
Talk
REBench: A Procedural, Fair-by-Construction Benchmark for LLMs on Stripped-Binary Types and Names
Benchmark & Dataset Track
Jun Yeon Won Ohio State University, Columbus, US, Xin Jin Meta, Shiqing Ma University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Zhiqiang Lin The Ohio State University
14:50
5m
Talk
RustBuildEq: A Benchmark for Binary Equivalence Under Build Variability
Benchmark & Dataset Track
Elliott Wen The University of Auckland, Chenye Ni , Valerio Terragni University of Auckland, Jens Dietrich Victoria University of Wellington
14:55
5m
Talk
TOGBench: A Developer-Written Multi-Variant Dataset and Benchmark Suite for Test Oracle Generation
Benchmark & Dataset Track
Tasfia Tasnim University of Texas at Dallas, US, Matthew B Dwyer University of Virginia, Soneya Binta Hossain University of Texas at Dallas
15:00
5m
Talk
HEJ-Robust: A Robustness Benchmark for LLM-based Automated Program Repair
Benchmark & Dataset Track
Fazle Rabbi Concordia University, Jinqiu Yang Concordia University
15:05
5m
Paper
JunoBench: A Benchmark Dataset of Crashes in Python Machine Learning Jupyter Notebooks
Benchmark & Dataset Track
Yiran Wang Linköping University, José Antonio Hernández López Department of Computer Science and Systems, University of Murcia, Ulf Nilsson Linköping University, Daniel Varro Linköping University / McGill University
Pre-print
15:10
5m
Talk
AgentTelemetry: A Fault Detection Benchmark and Toolkit for LLM Agent Observability
Benchmark & Dataset Track
15:15
15m
Live Q&A
Joint Q&A and Discussion
Benchmark & Dataset Track